Thursday, March 12, 2015

Warmonger Obama Goes Looking For Another War, In Venezuela This Time

The Obama Administration, which in 2009 provided backing for the coup that overthrew the progressive democratic President of Honduras and put into power a junta of oligarchs (Hillary Clinton's other big foreign policy disaster); a rerun as it turned out for the bloody coup that replaced the corrupt but democratically elected Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych, ad installed in Kiev a rabidly anti-Russian, equally corrupt, right wing extremist Government, thus sparking Ukraine’s civil war against the ethnic Russians in eastern Ukraine. These people had voted 90% for the pro - Moscow Yanukovych. Obama and his bloodthirsty little queer sidekicks are now, and not for the first time, trying to overthrow Venezuela’s democratically elected President, Nicolas Maduro.

Now I don't know enough about Venezuela's internal politics to be able to say whether President Maduro is a good leader or not, all I know is his government is Venexueala's choice and who rules in Cracas is a matter for the Venezuela's electorate to decide. It certainly has nothing to do with the corrupt, drug abusing former rent boy who is President of the United States of America.

In spite of that, on Monday March 9th Reuters headlined "U.S. Declares Venezuela a National Security Threat, Sanctions Top Officials," and their report gives its closing word to an opposition politician, whom Obama supports and who says: “It’s not a problem with Venezuela or with Venezuelans; it’s a problem for the corrupt ones” (i.e., Maduro and his Government).

In other words, while we know that the increasingly insane Obama, a man who believed from the outset he had been elected President Of The Entire Universe And Everything Else Besides, now thinks his job description requires him to go bullying his way round the world, imposing on sovereign nations leaders from the politically factions that have shown they will suck up to him and do America's bidding.

Apologists for American fascism would argue Obama is only trying to replace a ‘corrupt’ head-of-state. Unfortunately he seems to specialise in replacing 'corrupt' democratically elected heads of state, overturning the democratic process and replacing it with brutal tyranny in the case of Ukraine or failed state chaos as has happened in Libya.

And we must not forget Egypt, where the corrupt, brutal military dictatorship of Honsi Mubarack was replaced by an even more corrupt, brutal Islamic fundamentalist regime until the Egyptian military, appalled at the slaughter of Christians and people who were 'the wrong sort of Muslim', overthrew the Muslim Brotherhood regime and returned to the kind of relatively secular dictatorship the Mubarak regime practiced.

The White House justified an Executive Order (Presidential Decree, Obama's preferred method of lawmaking as he has not patience with the democratic process) issued on March 9th, which declared according to the press release, “President Obama declares a national emergency with respect to the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States posed by the situation in Venezuela. This is bullshit of course, Venezuela poses not threat to the USA

Specifically, the E.O. is aimed at neutralising those determined by the Department of the Treasury, in consultation with the Department of State, to be involved in actions or policies that undermine democratic processes or institutions. Not the democratic processes or institutions of the United States you should note, but those of the sovereign state of Venezuela, which are actually nothing to do with Barack Hussein Obama.

The Executive Order states that the existing Government of Venezuela limits human rights and is corrupt. Quite how this “constitutes an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States, and I hereby declare a national emergency to deal with that threat,” is not clearly explained.

On 14 February 2015, President Maduro had thwarted a coup-attempt against him that was engineered by the Governments of Canada and the UK. This came almost exactly a year after he had already thwarted such an attempt by the U.S. Government. In December 2013, the Maduro Government presented detailed evidence that the U.S. was planning a coup against him.

On 15 January 2015, Maduro met with Russian President Vladimir Putin in the Kremlin. The Obama Administration is, of course, committed to provoking Putin into starting World War Three.

President Obama is also trying to bring down Syria’s President Bashar al-Assad. In 2011, he had bombed away the regime of Libya’s President Muammar Gaddafi. Both Assad and Gaddafi also are/were allies of Russia, as is Iran. The Obama Administration is now assisting ISIS in its war against Assad, even while bombing ISIS.

And yet the supporters of the globalist, anti - democracy left as still trying to convince us this war worshipping arsehole is the peacemaker and conciliator who will lead the world to an era of harmonious prosperity. Well I suppose he might if people are prepared to accept that slavery to American Corporations represents any kind of freedom.

RELATED POSTS:

Venezuelan Social Movements Take to the Streets to Oppose U.S. Aggression
And now, with the security situation more dangerous that any time in the past fifty years, the peacemaker and joybringer, Barack Hussein Obama, The Obamessiah, is looking to start yet another civil war and plunge another nation into failed statehood. This time, as we reported a few days ago, his target is Venezuela

America Becomes More Belligerent Towards Russia. Is It Time To Prepare For War
As USA politiians and military leaders in Washington beat the war drum more loudly and European leaders, particularly in Germany and France get more jittery, we ask will there be war and why do the Americans seem so set in a shooting war.

Obama the real threat to world peace
Obama and Kerry, warmongers to the rich and famous
Obama and Putin play balls out politics
Barack Obama is the instigator of most current wars
Ukraine coup was US led
Obama's regime change project in Ukraine
USA seeking regime change in Venezuela

Elsewhere: [Boggart Blog]...[Little Nicky Machiavelli]...[Scribd]...[Wikinut] ... [Boggart Abroad]

The Imperatives Behind The New cold War

The ‘new Cold War,’ against Russia, is something of a misnomer, because it differs from the original version, against the U.S.S.R., in that it’s already a hot war, which started in Ukraine as being the key proxy-state for the American Government’s chief foreign-policy aim, of defeating Russia.

And it’s a war that is very bloody, and widely lied-about in both the U.S. and Europe, but that is discussed in Russia as if it were somehow the result of mere errors by Western powers, when in fact all of the Western leaders knew from the get-go that this was intended to be a lynching of Russia by Uncle Sam, and when the EU have been going along with this aim because the U.S. aristocracy supposedly have the interests of European aristocrats in mind and not only their own: it’s ’the Western Alliance,’ after all.

But it’s not ‘the Western Alliance,’ really. It’s instead a gangland war by aristocrats on the global stage, and it’s threatening to become the hottest war that ever was.

Continue reading at RINF



RELATED POSTS:

Russia Responds To Threats From EU's Juncker With Typical Bluntness


Russian sabre rattling has been getting the want-war brigade (all the lefties, pacifists and Obama worshippers strangely) very exited recently as they delight in trying to demonise Vladimir Putin (who to be sure is no angel) and push the case for a ground war in Ukraine, Syria, Iraq and Libya. But is is the west that has been behaving provocatively and Russian responses are understandable.

Germany Alarmed by Aggressive NATO Stance On Ukraine
Does It matter If The Dollar Is Replaced?
Europe Fractures: France Pivots To Putin, Cyprus Offers Moscow Military Base and Germany-US Splinter On Ukraine
China Warns U.S. to Stop Its Ukrainian Proxy War Against Russia
Russia Responds To Threats From EU's Juncker With Typical Bluntness